00:04:47 Hilary Traut (she/her): great to see you again! looking forward to your talk 00:35:13 Matt Jones: that’s just greek. still readable. 00:35:13 Albert Kim: Jess has frozen on my screen a few times in the last few minutes 00:35:41 Samuel Peter Paskewitz: Me too, although it’s been fairly brief for me 01:02:35 McKell Carter: Have to run, thanks, Jess! 01:04:23 Farron Straitz: I also have to go, but thanks for the talk! 01:05:11 Naomi Friedman: I also have to go. Great talk! 01:05:39 Eliana Colunga: is that a general tradeoff of memory? forest for trees kind of thing? 01:06:08 Shannon McKnight: This was a great talk! Sorry that this question is half formed but I was wondering if a simpler measure of thought content such as a simple count of word repetition across different thoughts would be predictive of trait rumination? Perhaps there are interesting differences in rumination where some are more likely to get very stuck on a singular theme whereas others are more varied in their negative thought rumination 01:06:36 Marie Banich: I think so at some level - if you back to the Mind of the Mnemonist, it would be argued that that is the case. But in mental illness, it seems to be this high-level and low-level with not much in between - so not a trade-off exactly 01:06:50 Tim Curran: Thanks Jess, great talk, got to run! 01:07:25 Eliana Colunga: ah, thanks! (1PM meeting for me too. Great talk!)