00:16:16	Albert Kim:	Sorry that I’m not sharing my video.  I’m in back pain and am grimacing from time to time , so I won’t share my ugly grimacing face with you!
00:20:04	Eliana Colunga:	are slides changing for others?
00:20:09	McKell Carter:	Nope
00:24:56	Eliana Colunga:	turning them into”symbols”? (easier to keep around, less precise)
00:25:39	Matt Jones:	then fidelity would be domain-specific, depending on repertoire of symbols
00:27:31	Hilary Traut (she/her):	it would also suggest there should have been a negative correlation between number and fidelity of items, correct?
00:30:02	Andrew Mertens (he/him/his):	what are individual differences like for precision? are people roughly equally good at remembering quality of small numbers of items? Are some people simply better at consolidating at the expense of precision?
01:10:33	Albert Kim:	Thanks so much, Ed.  I have to go to another meeting.
01:10:42	Hilary Traut (she/her):	Thank you for a wonderful talk - and answering all our detailed questions! I imagine that's what added some time!
01:10:52	Farron Straitz:	I also have to go, but thanks for the talk!
01:11:57	Eliana Colunga:	Same here. Thank you!!
01:19:07	Tim Curran:	Interesting talk, Thanks Ed!
01:20:27	Andrew Mertens (he/him/his):	yes, really interesting, thank you for the talk and thanks for taking the time to answer some of my questions
01:21:46	McKell Carter:	https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945220302859